What happens if a seller gives you false information to persuade you to buy a property? South African law offers protection in cases of misrepresentation, even where the contract includes a “voetstoots” clause. Depending on the circumstances, you may be entitled to cancel the sale or claim damages. A recent court decision outlines the rights of property buyers in South Africa.
When the Facts Don’t Add Up
Buying property is a major decision. You mostly rely on what the seller or agent tells you about the property’s condition, zoning, value, or features. But what if the information they give you turns out to be false? In South African law, this is referred to as misrepresentation. Whether the seller acted dishonestly, negligently, or even innocently, you may still have legal remedies. Importantly, a “voetstoots” clause, which typically protects sellers against hidden defects, does not necessarily prevent a claim.
What the Courts Have Decided
In the longstanding but still relevant case of Cockroft v Baxter (1955), the court held that a buyer who was induced to purchase a property based on an innocent material misrepresentation was entitled to cancel the contract, a remedy known as rescission. This was allowed even though the property was sold “voetstoots”. The key question was whether the false statement materially influenced the buyer’s decision.
More recently, in the case of Morgan Air Cargo (Pty) Ltd v Sim Road Investments CC & another (2009), the seller advertised a property as being zoned for commercial use. In reality, it was zoned for agricultural use. The court found this to be a material misrepresentation that justified a cancellation of the contract, restoring the parties to their original positions. This remedy is known as restitution. The buyer was persuaded to buy the property under a mistaken belief.
When a Seller’s Opinion Crosses the Line
Not everything a seller says is presented as fact. Statements like “this is a good investment” are often framed as opinions. In Orban v Stead and another (1978), the court drew a clear distinction between factual representations and mere opinions. However, where a seller has special knowledge, and you reasonably rely on their view, that “opinion” can carry legal weight and may amount to a misrepresentation.
Voetstoots Is Not a Licence to Lie
Many buyers worry that a voetstoots clause means they have no rights at all. This is not always true. In the case of Castelyn v Sellick and another (2016), the court reaffirmed that a voetstoots clause does not protect a seller where a misrepresentation persuades the buyer to enter into the contract. If the seller actively provides false information, voetstoots will not save them.
Similarly, in Hunt v Van der Westhuizen (1990), the Cape Provincial Division considered the relationship between misrepresentation and voetstoots clauses. The court confirmed that a seller cannot hide behind a voetstoots clause when they have made a misrepresentation that materially influenced the buyer’s decision to purchase. The clause only covers latent defects that the buyer did not ask about. It does not give the seller permission to lie.
Your Legal Remedies
Based on these cases, if you have been induced to buy a property through misrepresentation, you may have two main options:
- Rescission (Cancellation):You can cancel the contract and demand your money back.
- Damages:You may claim compensation for any financial loss you suffered because of the false statement.
If you believe a seller or agent misled you into purchasing a property, gather all relevant evidence, including emails, brochures, WhatsApp messages, and witness statements. Do not assume that a voetstoots clause prevents you from pursuing a claim.
Know Your Position Before You Act
South African law protects buyers against dishonest or misleading sellers. Previous cases have shown that even innocent misrepresentation can entitle you to cancel the sale or claim damages. A voetstoots clause is not a licence for sellers to provide false information.
While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither the writers of articles nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on information or recommendations contained herein. Our material is for informational purposes.